The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a passenger car with B low-priced typ.

On August 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 15:05, and moved to a right bypassing about 20 km from the direction of the truth to the direction of the city in the direction of the separation.

At the time of the above low-speed car transfer to another car, the victim E (76) is driving without registration. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to make a bypass after checking the right and the right of the front and the right of the right and the right of the front and the right of the right of the front and the right of the right of the right of the right of the front and the right of the right of the right of

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to overtake the above private-wheeled ones, and avoided the part of the hand hand on the left side of the above private-wheeled ones by negligence, which led the victim to fall off on the floor.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim, such as an injury to the two internal blood transfusions without an open address for about eight weeks due to such occupational negligence, thereby causing danger to life.

2. The facts charged in this case cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on December 6, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.