logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.07.18 2014고단2499
건설산업기본법위반등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for two years;

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant G’s position is the basic design of “U Construction Works” from the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Infrastructure Headquarters, the full responsibility supervision service, and the V-extension bridge (hereinafter “instant expansion bridge”).

W Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “W”) which has been awarded a contract for work, such as modification and design.

Defendant H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant H”) performing the design work of the instant extended bridge as a subordinate designer, who has overall control over the design work of the instant extended bridge, and Defendant A is performing the “U construction work” under a blanket contract from the Seoul Metropolitan Government Urban Infrastructure Headquarters.

Defendant I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant I”) who received a subcontract for the construction of concrete structures, such as the slves of the instant extension bridge, protective walls, etc., from Defendant H, as the chief of the construction division of Defendant H, who is a field agent of the said construction works, manages and supervises the entire construction works, and is in charge of safety management for the employees under his control and workers under his control. Defendant B, as the chief of the construction division of Defendant H, is the chief of the construction division of the said construction works.

A person who has been managing and supervising all the construction processes of steel reinforced concrete structures of the instant extended bridge as a field agent. Defendant D, as the chief of the official duty division of Defendant I, is a person who managed and supervised the construction process of steel reinforced concrete structures of the instant extended bridge by assisting Defendant C. Defendant E, as a supervisor affiliated with W, is performing the supervisory duties of “U construction” as a supervisor affiliated with W. On November 4, 201, Defendant J (hereinafter referred to as Defendant J) who is jointly and severally liable for the full responsibility supervision service for the said construction after W has defaulted on November 4, 201.

When receiving the above full-time responsible supervision service, a person who transferred his position to J and worked as a responsible supervisor for the above construction work, and Defendant F as Defendant E along with Defendant E, is called “U construction work.”

arrow