logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단2
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A ( South, 64 years old) is a person who drives C Poter Cargo Vehicles.

1. On September 6, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death, etc.) driven the above vehicle at a crosswalk in front of the E restaurant located in Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si, and driven one lane, one of the three-lanes, one of the three-lanes, one of which is to turn to the left at an indefinite speed in accordance with the normal new signals of the vehicle, by driving the said vehicle at a 5-lane of the three-lanes of the

At the same time, the crosswalk is installed around the intersection. In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to reduce the speed, to ensure the safe operation of the road, to check whether there is any person to walk, and to accurately operate the steering direction and the operation of the brakes by checking well the steering direction and the right and the right and the right and the right of the road, and to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant was proceeding without fulfilling such duty of care, the Defendant shocked the Victim F (son, 69 years old) who was a pedestrian-fluoring crosswalk on the crosswalk, with the front part of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to die of the above occupational negligence due to the death of the victim due to severe cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Zacheon University at around 04:25 around September 8, 2017.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Insurance shall operate any motor vehicle, other than those prescribed by Presidential Decree, on a road without purchasing mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said vehicle on the road, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the foregoing 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of the provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding traffic accident reports, traffic accident reports, black stuffs video CDs, field photographs, death watch, and mandatory insurance reports;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and the Criminal Act.

arrow