logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고단160
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On October 19, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on the 18:15th day of October, 2015, and 3rd day of the two-lane road in the Eth-lane D in Chuncheon City, the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the water from the bank, and the Defendant turn to the left to the eth day from the bank.

At all times, signal lights are installed, and the left turn turn is an intersection with no protective left turn, so in this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to look at the right and right of the front side in the driver of the vehicle well, and to make the left turn early so as not to interfere with the vehicle from the opposite side at the time of the signal.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to turn to the right by negligence and brought the front part of the driver G (20 years old) driving, which was in progress pursuant to the new code, in the opposite side of the left, into the right side of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim G by occupational negligence as above, thereby resulting in the victim G, which was mainly 77 in the number of Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, G at the Hancheon-si, G, on October 19, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. An investigation report (to attach booms and videos at the time of the accident);

1. A medical certificate of death and a photo of a changeer (the defendant and his defense counsel once stopped at the intersection where the defendant has a non-protective left left-hand turn, and the front left-hand left-hand turn was well examined whether there is a vehicle coming from the opposite side and left-hand turn. The victim argued that there was no negligence of violating the duty of care in relation to the occurrence of the above accident, since the victim gets out of the right-hand side of the driver's vehicle by driving the Ortoob in the speed without turning the headlight at night.

arrow