logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019. 07. 11. 선고 2019두39123 판결
(심리불속행)개별적인 입금이 그 일자, 액수, 거래 상대방 등에 비추어 수입과 무관한 거래로 인정되므로, 이를 원고의 매출누락액이라 볼 수 없음[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2018-Nu-20917 (Law No. 03, 2019)

Title

(A) Individual deposits are deemed unrelated to the Plaintiff’s revenue in light of their date, amount, transaction counterpart, etc., and thus, they cannot be deemed as omitting the Plaintiff’s revenue.

Summary

(b) Even if the amount deposited in the account of a financial institution is presumed to constitute sales or revenues, if there are special circumstances that can be acknowledged as personal transactions unrelated to the revenue in light of the date, amount, transaction counterpart and circumstances, it cannot be readily concluded that the report falls under sales or revenues omitted.

Related statutes

Article 57 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2019Du39123

Plaintiff-Appellee

Park ○

Defendant-Appellant

○○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2018Nu20917 Decided April 3, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

201.7.11

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow