logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.01.09 2018구합23352
직권면직 등 취소의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 3, 2015, the Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on July 3, 2015, and is still under probationary appointment period (hereinafter “Probationary appointment police officer”).

9. From July 1, 200 to Daegu Metropolitan City Police Agency (hereinafter “Tgu Local Police Agency”) served in the female juvenile community of the B police station.

B. Prior disciplinary action against the Plaintiff is 1) B Police Station General Disciplinary Committee (hereinafter “Disciplinary Committee”).

On March 7, 2016, the Plaintiff decided to dismiss the Plaintiff pursuant to Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 57 (Duty of Uniforms), and 63 (1) of the State Public Officials Act, on the ground that he/she violated the duty to maintain dignity as follows. Police officers are in line with all relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, various instructions, and orders, and maintain service and dignity in good faith. A. On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for overtime service from around 18:0 to 22:00, and filed an application for overtime service with the Plaintiff at G restaurant located in Daegu F along with a slope C, Gyeong C, Gyeong, Gyeong, and Maman, etc., to divide the Plaintiff into five (5), one (1), one (1), and one (2), and (1) of the two (1) of the two (1) of the 21:21 of the day, and (21) of the 21:21 of the day, the Plaintiff registered the Plaintiff’s fingerprint and fingerprint (hereinafter referred to “1”).

). 나. 이어서 원고는 C, D, E 등과 함께 대구 H에 있는 I 식당에서 소주 1병, 나가사키 짬뽕 1개, 음료수 2병을 나눠 먹은 후 23:00경 그 식당을 나왔다. 원고는 2016. 3. 1. 00:15경 혈중알코올농도 0.161%의 술에 취한 상태에서 대구 J에 있는 K고등학교 담장 주변에 주차된 자신의 모닝 승용차(L)를 운행하다가 반대편에서 오는 액센트 승용차와 접촉하여 교통사고를 발생케 하였다(이하 ‘제2 비위행위’라고 한다

(2) On March 8, 2016, the Defendant imposed a disciplinary measure on the dismissal of the Plaintiff according to the result of the said disciplinary measure.

3. The plaintiff is dissatisfied with the above dismissal disposition.

arrow