logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.10.30 2015고단720
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2015, around 15:35, the Defendant discovered the victim E (the age 21) waiting for a subway around the 10-1 platform of the Seoul direction platform of the 10-1 platform of the Manan-gu, Manan-si, Mann-si, Mann-si, the subway line C, and the subway line 10-1 platform of the Seoul direction platform, and subsequently, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by inserting the victim's her her her her her her amb

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. The police statement of E and F;

1. A E-document;

1. The defendant's statement is believed in light of the consistency of E's statement, the attitude of legal statement, etc., which is the victim's judgment on the assertion that he did not commit an indecent act on the CD in which the statement of the defendant was recorded, and the victim consistently stated that "any female under his name was aware of the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the defendant when he committed an indecent act on the part of the defendant," and F is also stating that "F was able to take out the defendant from subway because female under his name was identified the defendant," and it is difficult to immediately judge the credibility of the statements of the victim's statement. However, even according to the victim's statement, female under his name appears to have never been related to the defendant and the victim, it appears that there was no reason to judge the defendant as the criminal suspect, and the defendant's statement that "the person who made a statement in his name was made in his name and made in his name to the effect that he had no reason to recognize the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the defendant's witness's statement in his name."

arrow