1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from February 6, 2016 to March 24, 2017.

Basic Facts

A. On September 26, 2015, the Defendant puts down on the construction site of the Plaintiff-owned Dogwon (hereinafter “instant Dogwon”); on the glass of the said Dogwon building using the color frame, the color frame “for a person who enters the building site of the said Dogwon,” the Defendant puts on the Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dogwon’s Dog.; and on the other hand, the Defendant puts on the Dogwon’s Dog.”

B. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant instructed E, F, and G, the parts of the Plaintiff et al., to cut the electric wires inside the building and block the entrance in order to prevent the entry of the press party related to the press unit, including the Plaintiff, on the ground that he/she exercised a right of retention on the construction site of the instant press unit, and on the ground that he/she exercised a right of retention on the construction site of the instant press unit, and attached each item to the window of the outer wall of the building, by removing the reinforcement glass of the entrance of the office in order to enter the building inside the building.

C. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant cut electricity lines and water supply pipes connected to the flag source building, which are connected to the construction site, by ordering the Defendant’s husbands, E, F, and G, who were considered to move for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph, using the construction site, at the site of the instant construction site, and added a wooden joint plate in short of the building entrance.

On November 14, 2015, the Defendant puts down on the wall of container stuff installed by the Defendant a letter “A, as soon as possible, with the color frame changed from the wall of the container stuff installed there,” at the site of the instant reporter construction work.

E. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant was convicted of property damage, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) and the crime of insult due to the facts described in the above paragraphs (a) through (d), and became final and conclusive upon being sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, the purport of the entire argument of the plaintiff is asserted by the defendant, and 33,000,000 won related to the windows such as reinforcement glass and glass walls, etc. due to the damage to the original source of the lawsuit of this case.