Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 14:45, and turned down the road of 27-8 high-speed high-speed Do 27-8 high-speed Do 27-8 high-speed Do 200 high-speed Do 200, a high-speed Do 27-8 high-speed Do 200, a two-lane Do 200, a small-scale Do 200

Since there is a center line of yellow solid lines, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the vehicle line and operating the steering system and operating the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while driving the stroke, and was in the front part of the driver’s vehicle in front of the driver’s vehicle by the EWD D (31) drive, which was driven by the driver’s stroke line of the central line due to negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D by the foregoing occupational negligence, such as salt chills, tensions, etc. of the chills that require approximately 3 weeks of treatment to the victim D, and the injury to the victim F (V, 57 years old) who was on board the said franchistroke, accompanied by a non-fintering chills that require approximately 10 weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim G (V, 65 years old) of the same passenger who was on board the franchistrokes that require approximately 5 weeks of treatment, such as the franchis chills of the franchis in need of approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victim H (V, 28 years old) of the same passenger, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following circumstances are considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing).