A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant driven a Bn-ro car with alcohol content of 0.206% in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol around 16:30 on blood, and the Defendant driven a five-lane road near the upstream of the Cheong-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si, Chungcheong a speed of about 50 kilometers in speed from the upper west-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si.

At the time, the intersection of the street on the front of the road was a place where traffic is controlled by signal lights, and there were other vehicles passing through during the daytime time, and thus, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to properly operate the steering and steering system and to proceed with it in a safe way by properly operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol without showing the front door, and the part of the victim E (46 years old) driving of the victim C(60 years old) driving, which was under the influence of signal waiting at the same lane as the front direction of the defendant's running, was under the influence of the defendant's driving, and the front part of the above driver's vehicle was under the influence of the driver's driving of the victim E(46 years old) driving, which was under the influence of the signal waiting, and the front part was under the influence of the driver's driving of the victim E(46 years old) driving, which was under the influence of the signal waiting.

In addition, the Defendant did not check the rear side in order to allow the vehicle to move after the occurrence of the above accident, but did not check the rear side, but did not receive a part of the front part of the victim G(40 years old) driving which was stopped later than the passenger car.

The defendant suffered from the injury to the victim I (46 tax) who was a partner of the above victims and the above I (46 tax) for about two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1..