logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.02.10 2014고단1579
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a halog car.

On July 22, 2014, around 02:10, the Defendant driving a halog car, and driving a two-lane road in front of the “E veterinary hospital” located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, the Defendant continued to drive a halog car at the speed of about 86.1km from the long distance of Cheongju-si to the Sungdong Hospital.

At the time of night, the front door of the road was flowed at night, and there was a limited speed of 50km per hour. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the restricted speed and drive the motor vehicle safely by checking it well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went slowly in order to make a U-turn in the bee bank, due to the negligence of driving the restricted speed exceeding approximately 36.1km per hour, and received the part on the left-hand side of the Gra car of the victim F(18 years old), which temporarily stopped on one lane, from the Defendant’s left-hand side.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim F by occupational negligence in light of salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F, and the injury to the victim H (19 years of age) who was on the rash vehicle, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim I (15 years of age), and the injury to the victim I (15 years of age), such as salt, tensions, and tensions, which require approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim I. The victim J (16 years of age), who was on the back of the rash vehicle, was released from the ground through the rear window of the rash vehicle, thereby resulting in the death of the victim by blood transfusions, etc. under two mouths at the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, and I;

1. A traffic accident actual condition survey report and a comprehensive traffic accident analysis report;

1. A corpse inspection report, death diagnosis report, and each diagnosis report;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of "on-site photographs, moving pictures at the scene of an accident," and “accident site and image pictures of a person who suffered from an accident.”

arrow