Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
In around 2010, the Defendant, who is an employee of the real estate company D, was delegated to sell F apartment 106 Dong 903 (hereinafter “the instant apartment”) at 165 million won at two weeks owned by the victim E (hereinafter “the instant apartment”).
Afterward on October 27, 2010, the Defendant sold the above apartment complex to G, which is an employee of the same real estate company as the Defendant, for the purpose of selling the above apartment complex to 150 million won, and the Defendant was suffering from G, which included the remainder of the limitation of KRW 94 million and KRW 5 million in lease deposit.
However, on October 28, 2010, the victim notified the defendant that he would not sell the apartment of this case on the ground that the purchase price of the apartment of this case is not consistent, and requested the defendant to return 50 million won as the price for the apartment from the multi-faceted side of the trade name in Suwon-si around October 28, 2010 to G and issued a cashier's check of 50 million won.
Nevertheless, the Defendant was willing to purchase the real estate (364/80 of the share of H 8,029 square meters in Gyeonggi-do) in the name of the victim E, which was promoted for the divided sale after having opened a divided ownership register in D Co., Ltd.
1. Forgery of private documents;
A. A. On November 15, 2010, the Defendant, without authority, had a judicial scrivener of the JJ enter the name “YYYYYYYYYYY H 8,029 square meters (364/80 of shares to be sold)” in the column for indicating real estate in the form of the sales contract, “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
B. The proxy forgery Defendant: (a) around November 15, 2010, Ginju-gun of Gyeonggi-do.