A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

203,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Since the Defendant is not a person handling psychotropic drugs, the Defendant is prohibited from handling the psychotropic drugs-related Mesopha (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”).

1. On August 2018, the Defendant administered philophones by inserting approximately 0.03g of philophones into a single-use injection machine and dilution them with water at the Defendant’s residence located in Heungsi apartment B apartment C around the end of August 2018.

2. On October 26, 2018, around October 26, 2018, the Defendant administered phiphones by inserting approximately 0.03 gramopon into a single-use injection machine and dilution it with water at the Defendant’s residence located in Heungi City B apartment C around October 26, 2018.

No person of "2018 Highest 4017" shall smoke or take in marijuana or marijuana seed coats.

Nevertheless, on October 2018, the Defendant smoked marijuana in a way of inserting the pipes made by the stuffing paper in the presence of the Defendant, which was located in the B apartment C, which was located in the middle of Sinung-si, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 3906"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Each request for appraisal and each report on narcotics appraisal "2018 Highest 4017";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a narcotics appraisal report;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the point of a scopon medication) and Article 61 (1) 4 (a), and Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (the point of a scopon medication) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The criminal defendant committed the instant crime again even though he/she had been punished several times for the reason of sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.