beta
Text
1. The plaintiff A shall dismiss the primary claim on each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 of the plaintiff A;
2. The plaintiff A-Class.
Reasons
1. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion
A. 1) Since the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 of Plaintiff A is owned by Plaintiff A, the ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 is sought against the State. 2) Since Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. entered into a title trust agreement with Plaintiff A on each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 and acquired ownership transfer under the name of the paper members stated in the preliminary claim Nos. 1 and 2, the ownership of
B. 1) Since the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3 of the Plaintiff’s primary claim is owned by the Plaintiff’s Class B, the ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3 is sought against the State. 2) Since the Plaintiff’s preliminary claim No. 3 entered into a title trust agreement with the Plaintiff and received ownership transfer in the name of the specifications stated in the preliminary claim, the ownership is sought against the State on behalf of the Plaintiff.
2. Determination as to the plaintiff A’s claim for the part of the plaintiff A
A. Determination as to the claim regarding each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1) The defendant's claim for the confirmation of ownership against the defendant who is a state of the main defense point of the safety of the defendant does not have any interest in confirmation. 2) The claim for the confirmation of ownership against the judged state is not unregistered and it is impossible to identify the person who is registered in the land cadastre or the forest land cadastre or the forest land cadastre or the forest land cadastre, and there is a benefit in confirmation only when the state denies the ownership of a third party who is a registered titleholder and in special circumstances exist
(See Supreme Court Decision 95Da14817 delivered on July 25, 1995, etc.). Each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 does not have a register. However, according to the entry of evidence No. 3 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), each of the above real estate was assessed on March 8, 1913 by O, and the address of O, who is the first assessment titleholder in the old land cadastre as to each of the above real estate, is “P”.