logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.12.13 2013고단1471
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 11, 2013, at around 21:20, the Defendant driven B truck under the influence of alcohol with a 0.161% alcohol concentration 0.1% from the 1km section from the front day of the “ebenc” nuclear power plant in Overcheon-si to the front day of the said 37-1st road.

2. On July 11, 2013, at around 22:06, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “I sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

[Case No. 1]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on detection of the driver from the host driver (the fact of crime No. 2 in the market);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act for the crime, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act for the crime;

1. Each selective fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant is not well-known despite the fact that he was under the suspension period of the execution of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant should be sentenced to the severe punishment, but his depth is against the crime, and the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is committed after May 196, 196, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties shall be decided by the fine and the punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined after considering the fact that he did not have any record of punishment since December 206.

arrow