1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 31,605,578 as well as to the plaintiff on June 2009.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Paragraph (1). Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. In addition to the matters stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the Schedule of Calculation of Compensation for Damages shall be as follows, and in principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

(a) Personal information on lost income (1): as stated in the column for “basic matters” in the annexed amount of damages calculation sheet.

(2) Occupation and income: 4.08% from January 8, 2010 to June 1, 2012; 26.43% from June 2, 2012 to June 1, 2014; 2.8% from June 2, 2015 to June 2, 2015; (a) hospitalization period (a) hospitalization period (from June 2, 2009 to January 7, 2010): 10%; 4.08% from January 8, 2010 to June 1, 2012; and 3 years from June 2, 2015 to June 2, 208% from June 2, 2015 to the date of operation.

) In light of the fact that there is a serious trauma, i-A-3-d paragraph, occupational coefficient 5), 24% breadth of old light ability loss rate, but there is no special problem in terms of the essential function, and that there is no special visit in the neological examination and identification and reflective examination, it is recognized as above according to the result of the physical entrustment to the Head of the Central University Hospital of the Party, and contrary thereto, the result of the physical entrustment to the Head of the Central University Hospital of the first instance court of the first instance for the Head of the Hanyang University Hospital is not believed.

(2) 5 years Han-gu Market (14% applying mutatis mutandis approximately 52% of the frame of the disability assessment table I-A-1-a (27%) due to the cutting off of 2, 3, and scirical frame, etc., 14% of the Plaintiff’s 14% of the loss of labor ability was combined.