A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:30 on July 30, 2014, the Defendant, at the office B of the Ulsan-dong Police Station B located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, under investigation, was a suspect of the sexual traffic arrangement case at the “E” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Police Station D from the police officer C belonging to the said police station, and signed the interrogation protocol as F without authority for the purpose of exercising authority, and forged the above F’s signature at the end of the interrogation protocol without authority, and presented it to the said C as if the above F’s signature was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to F

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of a private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of a private signature).

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is that the person is under investigation by an investigative agency, and the signature of the suspect interrogation committee is not less vulnerable to the criminal liability, but wrong is recognized, the person has no criminal record or fine other than the criminal records, and the sentencing data recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and environment, shall be determined as ordered.