A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 09:50, at the criminal office and office of the Ulsannam Police Station in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, Seoul-dong 2-2, 689-2; (b) around 04:00 of the same month, the Defendant, who was investigated as a suspect, made an investigation of the fact that he/she did not engage in any act such as d'E in the act of d'E at the same time, and entered the name of d'E in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendant at the end of the protocol of suspect interrogation.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged the above D's signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority.

2. The Defendant, without authority for the purpose of exercising the above date, time and place, submitted the signature in the above D’s name stated in the above suspect interrogation protocol to the Speaker F who knew of the forgery of the signature, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Instructions to make a report on the re-preparation, such as drilling of corrected materials based on personal chart;

1. Residents' inquiry;

1. A copy of the case invoice;

1. Copy of the suspect examination protocol (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Evidence No. 17);

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is poor, the sentence shall be determined and sentenced as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant is the primary offender and the investigation agency recognized the crime.