logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.10.08 2014가합1920
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,632,565 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from September 11, 2013 to October 8, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Defendant is a company with the purpose of manufacturing, wholesale and retailing, and exporting and importing feed for pet animals. 2) The Plaintiff, as a shipbuilding yard of Chinese nationality, was in charge of crushing of meat necessary to make animal feed while working as an employee of the Defendant from July 15, 2013.

B. The structure and work process of the crushing machine 1) The Plaintiff’s scrap crushing machine used in the Plaintiff’s scrap crushing work (hereinafter “instant crushing machine”).

(2) The instant crushing machine is composed of lifts (the place where raw material meat is put in inside the crushing machine), rop (the place where the raw material meat is cut in one lane), sprink (the first raw material meat is transferred to the second pulver), spackers (the second pulverization and mination of raw material meat), spackers (the second pulverging of raw material meat) and so on. (2) The instant crushing machine is installed at the entrance of the crushing machine in which the work executor puts the freezing raw material meat into the culverg in the culverging machine, then the culging machine is cut in the upper part of the other part (the upper part and lower part) by the scrap of the culging machine.

C. At around 08:50 on September 10, 2013, the Plaintiff was trying to open a lid in the part of the other part and remove the remaining scrap in hand while working with the instant crushing machine, and the Plaintiff was faced with the injury that was cut off by hand on the part of the said machine (at the time of the accident, the Plaintiff was faced with the wall in order of the face gate and the string, and the remainder of the wall was sealed by the wall, and the hand was fasted on the lower part, while the rubber lock was fasted on the wall, and the hand was cut off with the upper part).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [The grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, and 11, Eul evidence Nos. 4-1 and 2, Eul evidence Nos. 2-2 through 8, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1 Party on the basis of liability for damages.

arrow