logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.04 2018고단362
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of three million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A person who operates F to manufacture food, such as rice tea, etc. in Kimhae-si, a person in charge of overall management of matters concerning the safety and health of workers belonging to the above workplace. Defendant A is a vice head of F in charge of safety management in the workplace. Victim G (G, 29 years old) is a person in charge of mination of rice in the above company, rice mination of rice, rice mination of rice, and mination of rice (mix of minated rice and salt).

Since the removal of a coverr is open to the front part when the removal of a cover is made, the body of the workr is likely to be melted in the front part when the removal of a coverr and the operation of machinery is done.

In particular, even after the occurrence of an accident in which a worker was missing from the opening of a rice washing machine in the workplace around July 18, 2016, the worker operated a bridge so that the worker can easily discharge rice sludge at the time of washing work for the convenience of work, even after the worker was missing from the opening of a rice washing machine, so that the worker can easily discharge rice sludge for the convenience of work.

Therefore, as the Defendants in charge of safety management, there was a duty of care to educate the workers in charge of safe washing work, and thoroughly supervise them to prevent accidents by removing covers and thoroughly controlling them so that they do not operate the teaching team.

Nevertheless, Defendant B did not take any particular measures to improve the dangerous work method without providing the victim with the education on the safe washing work method, despite being aware of the fact that workers such as the victim of the ordinary lives, such as the victim of the ordinary lives, have removed the cover and run the lives.

In addition, the defendant A does not provide education on the safe washing working method to the victim, and does washing work.

arrow