logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.05 2017가단5028866
선수금 반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff subscribed to a “new task for the development of nuclear technology for new renewable and renewable energy convergence in 2015,” which is a national policy project conducted by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning, and participated in the “development of alternative bridge-type generation technology for energy self-support bridges” (hereinafter “instant project”). From June 2015, the Plaintiff participated in the instant project.

B. The Plaintiff conducted meetings between the Defendant with technology necessary to carry out the instant project and the e-mail exchange, and the person in charge, and the Defendant’s employees A presented a written estimate of the contents as indicated below to the Plaintiff around February 16, 2016.

Protect SPP PC - Devices converting direct current electricity into direct electricity or exchange electricity. Electrical power shall be supplied to the system in connection with a new renewable power source and storage batteries, and products charged with storage batteries in the system or power generator at a voluntary installation time (including development of AC/DC stop - 10kw - Hybid - 60,000,00 for self-driving - ex post facto management 40,000,000,000 ex post facto management containers - 20,000,000, 000, 00, 000, 000, - 00, 000, - 00, 00, 000, -30,000, -30,000, -30,000, -30,000, -30,000, -30,000, -30,00.

2. The terms and conditions of settlement are payable in accordance with the annual table of tasks.

3. The PCS has the honor to develop and supply the PCS exclusively used for the PCing of power generation machinery.

6. The task F/U has the honor to be guidelines for field assistance for three years following the start of the task.

B. Upon the receipt of the above draft, the Plaintiff requested the modification of specifications to reduce costs, and A, on March 31, 2016, prepared a written estimate with the contents as specified in the table 2 as indicated below (hereinafter “instant quotation”). The Plaintiff.

arrow