The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not recognize the occurrence of an accident at the time of misunderstanding the facts and misapprehending the legal doctrine.

In addition, the injury suffered by the victim does not constitute "injury" in the crime of the escape vehicle.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the misapprehension of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether the Defendant knew of the occurrence of an accident at the time, the Defendant could recognize the fact that the Defendant had escaped without taking any measures despite the recognition of the occurrence of an accident at the time. Thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

① 피해 차량을 촬영한 사진에 의하면 피해 차량의 좌측 전조 등 측면 부의 아래쪽이 상당한 정도로 찌그러져 움푹 들어가 있고 도장이 완전히 벗겨질 정도로 긁혀 있는 모습을 확인할 수 있는 바, 위와 같은 피해 차량의 파손 정도만 보더라도 가해 차량과 피해 차량이 충돌한 강도가 상당한 정도의 것임을 알 수 있고, 이는 블랙 박스 영상을 통해 확인할 수 있는 충격음과 가해 차량 및 피해 차량의 흔들림 정도를 보더라도 알 수 있다.

(2) The defendant, at the time of the accident, was unable to hear shocks in light of the fact that he was unable to load a harming vehicle without fixing the hand.

주장 하나, 블랙 박스 영상을 보더라도 당시 가해 차량 적재함에 덜컹거리는 소리를 낼 만한 물건이 실려 있는 모습이나 피해 차량과의 충격 시 그 물건이 덜컹거리면서 적재함 내부에서 움직이는 모습 등이 전혀 확인되지 않는다.

(3) In addition, the defendant is not in good condition because his/her hearing ability is excessive to a half of the general hearing ability due to an artificial high-end operation.

However, even if the statement of the defendant is based on the statement of the defendant, the defendant prevents the defendant from making a public notice.