1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the defendant added the following judgments as to the matters alleged in the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The defendant asserts that the defendant's liability should be limited since the accident of this case occurred, even though the driver of the damaged vehicle was negligent in driving in preparation for the vehicle that passed beyond the central line, as seen above, because the driver of the damaged vehicle could not but proceed beyond the central line due to the illegal parked vehicle at the time of the accident in this case.

In addition, considering the following circumstances, the driver of a sea-going vehicle seems to proceed beyond the central line without taking measures such as speeding the opposite vehicle at the time of the accident, and the fact that the driver of a sea-going vehicle seems to proceed beyond the central line without taking measures such as speeding the opposite vehicle at the time of the accident, and the fact that the driver of a sea-going vehicle is not going to the right direction at the time of the accident, but proceeds to the opposite vehicle in order to avoid the vehicle parked in the direction of the right direction. ② The driver of a sea-going vehicle may move the light on the vehicle parked in the direction of the right direction before the right direction, so it was difficult to see that the driver of a sea-going vehicle is a driver of a vehicle damaged by the road beyond the central line.