1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On July 14, 2016, the prohibition period of prohibition of departure was extended on July 14, 2016, by January 5, 2017.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). Part II “15” in Part II “15” in the first instance court’s decision, following the second instance court’s decision, the term “19” was as follows: (a) the representative director F is the Plaintiff’s partner; (b) D, E, and F have been appointed as the representative director and in-house director of each of the C; (c) from 2009 to 2013, at least 50% of the C’s shares were owned from 209 to 2013.

(2) From 2011 to 2013, the total amount of D’s shares was transferred to G in 2014, and the total amount of D’s three shares became 49%. Following the third judgment of the first instance court, C settled the Plaintiff’s airline ticket, and the Plaintiff is indicated as C’s representative in 2012 and 2014 (a contract).

2) On September 22, 1999, H, the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she was

According to the third sentence of the first instance court's decision, "16, 17, 18, and 20" shall be added to "12, 16, 17, 18, and 20", and the following circumstances, i.e., C shall be the head office of the last one.