Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
under section 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, the term “this court” shall be read as “the court of first instance”.
B. Under the second page of the judgment of the first instance court, “the result of the request for the examination of medical records with respect to the Gyeong University Hospital of the first instance and the second instance court”, “or 50%” was added to “the result of the request for the examination of medical records with respect to the Gyeong University Hospital of the first instance and the second instance court,” and “or 50%” was added to “3 15 %” (or 50%” of the judgment of the first instance court, and the appraisal of the first instance court was limited to the upper part of the disease in the second instance on July 23, 2009. The Ro RoI appears to have followed the second instance judgment on December 26, 2014. While presenting the same medical opinion as the appraisal of the first instance court, it is difficult to accept the report on the ratio of credit contribution with respect to the second instance court’s remaining 50%, it is difficult to accept the report from the first instance court and the second instance court’s first instance court’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment.
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.