Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 27, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months for the crime of acquiring stolen goods at the Daegu District Court, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years. On February 21, 2014, the Defendant appealed against this and became final and conclusive as it was by a judgment dismissing an appeal at the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant acquires stolens;

A. On October 31, 2012, from around 23:00 to 0:00 on the same day, two smartphones, such as gallon 21,000 won, each of which was known to the fact that a passenger was lost from a taxi engineer in front of the Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology located in Gyeongnam-si, Jinnam-si, Jinnam-si, and that they were purchased at 10,000 won, 50,000 won, 50,000 won, even after being aware of the fact that the passenger was the stolen.

B. On October 2012, 2012 patrolmen, around 21:00, purchasing two smartphones, such as gallon jusium 21,000 won, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 900,000,00,000, in and near Daegu-gu B, Daegu-gu, and 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

C. On December 2, 2011, at around 23:00, 23:00, H acquired 9 smartphones, including gallon jus 21 unit, which was purchased by H from G adjacent to G around Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu, via G via G, with knowledge of the fact that the market value of 8.50,00 won is a stolen property, and acquired it from H.

2. On November 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) with D, the Defendant kept smartphones acquired with stolen property as referred to in paragraph 1(a) of the above Article, which the Defendant lost, to the victim I (the age of 18) who was a succeeding ship of the Defendant’s region, and demanded the victim to compensate for the loss of it, but the victim demanded the victim to pay compensation, but the victim was not entitled to the Defendant’s telephone without paying compensation, and the victim led the victim to bullying, “I am in the face of 100 children,” and “I am in the face of 40 children, I am in the face of the victim, by means of multiplying the victim’s seat.”