1. The Defendant’s KRW 18,756,742 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from August 16, 2017 to September 25, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The defendant is a mutual aid contractor who has entered into a mutual aid agreement to pay the mutual aid money in respect of damage caused by an accident that occurred in the operation of the C Freight (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

B) On August 16, 2017, around 18:40 on August 16, 2017, the Plaintiff is a D-car (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) from five lanes at a point 342km located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan Busan, Busan, Busan.

E is driving and driving. E is an accident in which the left-hand part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle operating five lanes in front of the right-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving the vehicle at the same time, at the same place and at the same four lanes and changing the vehicle to five lanes (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(C) The Plaintiff caused the instant accident, resulting in the injury, such as the external malphe of the climatic signboard, the external malphe of the climatic signboard, the external malphe of the nephical malphe of the nephical signboard, and other conical m

In light of the above facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the argument as a whole, the judgment of the court below reveals that although Eul, the driver of the defendant vehicle, had a duty of care to change the vehicle at an appropriate speed so as not to conflict with the previous vehicle while maintaining a safe distance with the vehicle that is going ahead of the vehicle when changing the vehicle line, the accident of this case occurred due to the failure to perform such duty of care, and the plaintiff suffered losses due to the accident of this case. Therefore, the defendant, the mutual aid business operator of the defendant vehicle, is liable to pay mutual aid money to the plaintiff for losses caused by the accident of this case. (B) The defendant's assertion that the defendant is liable to limit liability 1) caused the accident of this case by the competition that the plaintiff operated while neglecting the duty of care at the front, rear, left, and left.