beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff A KRW 3 million, KRW 500,000 to the Plaintiff B, and KRW 300,000 to the Plaintiff C, and each of the above amounts.
Reasons
1. The Defendant was indicted on the charge of fraud against Plaintiff A, child abuse against Plaintiff C, etc., and became final and conclusive upon conviction (one year of imprisonment, etc.) for the following crimes:
[1] The first instance court: Decision 2018 Gohap49 decided September 20, 2018; Decision 2018 Godan914 decided April 5, 2019; the appellate court: Gwangju High Court Decision 2018No423, 2019No194 decided August 27, 2019; and the appellate court: Decision 2018Ma423, 2019No194 decided August 27, 2019). (In the following below, the defendant, the defendant, the defendant, and the defendant, the plaintiff A, and the F refer to the plaintiff C) The Gwangju District Court Branch Decision 2018 Gohap49 decided September 20, 2018.
1. Around December 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) made a false statement to the effect that “The victim E was able to receive money by investing in Onnuri gift certificates through the friendship J in the I Bank, and to receive money from 4% to 28% if it invests in money.”
However, there was no fact that the defendant invested in Onnuri gift certificates, and there was no intention or ability to make an investment in the gift certificates or to make a repayment of other existing debts with money from the victim or to prevent so-called return under the pretext of profit.
Around December 16, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30 million won from the victim to the K bank account under the name of the Defendant from the victim, and acquired the money by transfer from around August 4, 2017 through 58 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1, from around August 4, 2017.
2. Around December 2016, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant graduated from the Department of Information on the Press of L University, even though the Defendant’s final academic background was a high school; (b) the Defendant was able to add the English subject of L UniversityF to the English subject of L University.
The Defendant above.