All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence is heavy.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is light.

2. In full view of the circumstances revealed in the grounds of sentencing and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court asserts that the sentencing is heavy or uncomfortable (the Defendant is not the owner of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, but the employee is merely an employee, and thus the degree of participation is light.

However, the defendant acknowledged the facts charged that he operated the sexual traffic business of this case jointly with A in the court of the court below.

There is also a fact that the payment for sexual traffic occurred at the instant sexual traffic business establishment to the account of the defendant's female-friendly job offering M.

A, when the first police controled, he was the owner of the instant sexual traffic, and he was the employee of the prosecutor's office, and the actual owner of the instant sexual traffic was the defendant.

The Defendant was recognized as an employee by the lower court and was sentenced to a suspended sentence, and started to make this assertion only after the judgment became final and conclusive.

Considering these circumstances, it is difficult to see that the defendant is merely an employee.

As alleged by the defendant, simple participation as an employee;

Even if the defendant's criminal records are considered, the sentence of the court below is not recognized to be unfair). 3. Conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed.