The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized that all of the instant crimes were committed, thereby opposing his mistake.

Family, branch, etc. of the defendant continuously wanted to support the defendant's wife.

The defendant is only punished by a fine, but has no criminal record of suspended execution or more.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant in collusion with B, etc. to rent about seven officetels rooms and to advertise a commercial sex business establishment using a medium with high radio wave such as the Internet. The punishment of the crime of this case is to systematically operate a commercial sex business establishment by employing female-friendly districts, etc. as an employee and distributing detailed roles, such as fund management, reservation, female sex trafficking management, office guidance, etc. The crime is heavy in light of the method and contents of the crime, business period and size, etc.

Before regulating the crime of paragraph (1) of the judgment below, the Defendant, even at the same place as indicated in the judgment below, controlled sexual traffic at the same time, and committed the crime of paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below by resumption of business even though he was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million on April 20, 2015, and continued to commit the crime of paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court below after the Defendant escaped, and transferred the place of business to another person.

Considering the fact that the defendant plays a leading role in the management and operation of sexual traffic women in the course of engaging in sexual traffic brokerage business, it is necessary to impose more severe responsibility on the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, if the court below comprehensively takes into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, equity in sentencing with the accomplices, etc., the application of the sentencing guidelines to the defendant according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee (one year to four years and six months) are as stated in the judgment below.

within the lowest limit.