Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:00 on January 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a cret of the victim’s out of Ulsan-gu C victim D; (b) opened a cret of the victim’s out of the outside and intruded the victim’s residence through a window where the following correction was not made; and (c) followed the internal cremation cremation string, etc., and then cut the 18K gold string amounting to KRW 350,000 at the market price of both parties; (d) KRW 250,000 at the total market price of 14K gold straws and two half of half of half of half of half, and KRW 100,00 at the market price of 18K Gold-gu C victim D; and (e) one gold strawing and cream tackt, each of gold 1, 13,80 won at the market price of 18K-gu string and one half of them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the seizure protocol and photographs (No. 5 and 6 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of larceny) and Article 319 (1) of the same Act (the point of intrusion upon residence) - Selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act prohibits the Defendant from committing the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime. However, the community service order issued to the Defendant was fully implemented, most of the direction and supervision by the probation officer was complied with, the victim does not want the punishment of the Defendant, the Defendant is able not to repeat the crime while performing military service in depth, and all other circumstances revealed in the arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment.