logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.05.16 2012고합390 (1)
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant is known to C and D’s follow-up routes, and they are so-called “school career” to students in female high schools.

1. On July 2012, the Defendant and D, who jointly committed the sexual intercourse with D, proposed that they receive sexual intercourse (tentatively called “defluence”) from the male of the other male of the other male of the other male of the year, by stating that “I will not see that I will come to and go to us. I will protect us. I will do it.”

On July 9, 2012, from around 03:00 to around 14:00 on July 11, 2012, the Defendant and D demanded the victim to engage in sexual traffic once more in the same way in the same manner as the above temporary border, by linking the victim’s mother with the ID in the name of “I” and “J” in the Internet site, the Internet site, “I” and the mother’s mother’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with D to induce the victim to become the counterpart of the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

2. The Defendant, C, and D, joint criminal conduct with C and D from July 11, 2012

7. From 21:00 on March 21, 13, the said Hel, by means of a computer installed therein, sought sexual intercourses more than 6 times in the same manner as above, by attempting to conduct a hosting with the “I” and the “J” hosting room, and by having the victim receive 100,000 won from the insular telecom and establish a sexual relationship with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C and D, induced the victim to become the partner of the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

D. The second interrogation protocol of prosecutor's interrogation of C against each prosecutor's office F.

arrow