beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 8,677,050 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,00,000 to Plaintiff C, and KRW 1,00,00 to Plaintiff B, and each of them.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:
Plaintiff
C and Plaintiff B are married couple, and they are parents of Plaintiff A.
B. The Defendants are married with a husband and wife, and F’s parents.
C. The Plaintiff A and F were enrolled in the first and third classes of G elementary schools in the year of 2016.
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 17, H, who was enrolled in the same half of the year of Plaintiff A, F, and G elementary school on February 7, 2017, was playing with water left above the above school ice ices during the point of the first instance trial on February 7, 2017, while the F, while being pushed away with the Plaintiff’s inside and outside of the Plaintiff’s eye so as to cause the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the heart and loss of the skin, which requires two-day medical treatment from the inside of the Plaintiff, and the knive body of the knive body of the knive body of the knive body of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
According to the above facts, the F suffered injury by the Plaintiff A due to the accident of this case, so far as it is difficult for the Plaintiff A as above, and F was a first-year student of the 7 years old elementary school at that time and did not have the ability to change the responsibility for the above tort.
Therefore, the defendants, who are legally obligated to supervise F, are jointly liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff C and his parents due to the accident in this case.
(Article 755(1)(b) of the Civil Act.
The plaintiffs' assertion and the summary of the 1st century asserted that not only damages caused by the accident in this case against the defendants, but also F has continuously been bullyinged with the contents of the following table and the plaintiff A, and therefore, they are liable to compensate for damages caused thereby.
F began in F from September 2016 to friendly with Plaintiff A who had the same friendly relationship with him from around September 2016, and it is somewhat passive and resistant from around October of the same year.