The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as indicated in the instant facts charged, had the victim, who was a passenger, left the taxi, but did not depart from the taxi while the victim did not board the taxi, and the victim was far away from the taxi in the course of boarding the taxi.

Even if the defendant was the victim due to the wind to start the taxi,

In light of the above legal principles, the Defendant’s negligence and the victim’s injury did not constitute the crime of injury on the part of the victim, and the Defendant’s negligence and the victim’s injury did not constitute the crime of injury.

However, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

B. The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (an amount of five million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) As to the assertion of mistake of facts, first, we examine the argument that the defendant does not have any means to start the taxi while the victim did not board the taxi.

피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 ‘ 이 사건 당시 피고인 운행의 택시 앞 좌석에는 피해자의 형부 G이 타고, 뒷 좌석에는 피해자의 조카, 피해자의 언니 F의 순으로 탔으며, 이어서 피해자도 탑승하고자 왼발을 택시 안쪽에 올려놓았을 때 피고인이 택시를 출발시켜 피해자의 무릎이 쓸리면서 택시 밖 뒤쪽으로 넘어지며 땅에 엉덩방아를 찧었다’ 라는 취지로 진술하였고, 이는 F, G의 수사기관 및 원심 법정 진술과 어긋나는 부분이 전혀 없으며, 달리 위 진술들이 허위 임을 인정할 만한 정황은 찾아 볼 수 없다.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion that this part of facts is erroneous is without merit.

2) Next, we examine the assertion that there is no relationship between the Defendant’s negligence and the victim’s injury.

A) The Defendant is also identical to the lower court’s judgment.