logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.03.24 2016고합242
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등추행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who committed the crime at the latest in 2013, committed the crime at the latest in 2013, divided the conversation between the victim D (at the time, 13 years old) and the sexual relationship with the victim with the “C” at the latest in 2013, and the victim’s vehicle in front of the victim’s house in the Cheongju-si, sent the victim to the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the victim’s house in the Cheongju-si, and was talked with the victim in the nearby park, and was rejected by the victim.

The term "the victim" refers to "the idea was changed."

(1) does not refuse to do so.

"" means "buckbucks, and chests of the victim continue to exist even when the defendant was sealed, the victim's bucks, and the chests were stored into the victim's counter-bucks, and the victim's chests were promptly stored.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act against a child or juvenile victim by force.

2. The Defendant committed a crime with the name of the Defendant in 2014, as described in paragraph 1 of the 2014 nomenclature, and then contacted the victim (the 14 years old at the time) who was at the contact with the Defendant, to the “C”, which was at the 14 years old age, to the “C”, and “the victim is nomenclad only once” in 2014, and the victim is on the back of the Defendant’s house located in Cheongju-gu, Seocho-gu, and the victim is under the birth of the victim.

E. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.", however, the scam was cut in the scam and the scam was cut in the scam.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act against a child or juvenile victim by force.

3. The Defendant committed the crime of August 2, 2016, when he was aware of the fact that the other party was a victim of the conversationed with the “F” in 2016, as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, and the contact was interrupted, the Defendant called the victim (the age of 16 at the time). As the victim did not receive the phone, the Defendant was aware of the victim’s “middle school, a place of residence, and his family members going to four.”

N. N. N. H. so doing.

arrow