beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
A. Of the land in paragraph 1 of the attached Table 1, the attached Table 2 appraisal drawings shall be marked 17, 18, 19, 40, 41.
Reasons
1. On April 10, 1974, the Defendant purchased the land indicated in Paragraph (2) of the same Table, adjacent to the land indicated in Paragraph (1) of attached Table 1, from C, and completed the registration of ownership transfer by receipt No. 44840 on August 25, 1981.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant land”). From April 10, 1974, the Defendant resided in the Defendant’s land-based housing from around April 10, 1974.
The defendant removed the existing house on the ground of the defendant's land and newly built the house listed in the attached Table 1 list, and completed the registration of preservation of ownership as of May 19, 2008, received on May 19, 2008.
(C) On October 4, 2013, the Plaintiff received the land of Paragraph (1) indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 from the father D (E) on October 4, 2013, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 58400, Oct. 7, 2013, 2013, such as Daegu District Court racing support, etc.
(C) The Plaintiff’s land indicated in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “the Plaintiff’s land”). The Defendant owned and used the Plaintiff’s land on the ground of 157 square meters of land, such as landscape stone and landscape trees, and owned and used it for the Defendant’s housing, and owned and used it for the Defendant’s housing, among the Plaintiff’s land of this case, the portion of “A” (hereinafter referred to as “A” in the order of 157 square meters connected each point of the attached sheet No. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19, 20, 21, 30, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 14 of the attached sheet No. 2 of the land of this case (hereinafter referred to as “the land of this case”) connected each point of “A” (hereinafter referred to as “A” in the attached sheet No. 2 of this case. 3 of this case.
Before the Defendant purchased the Defendant’s land, there was a farm road, such as a photographic image, between the Defendant’s land and the Plaintiff’s land, and cement with a width of four meters around 2003.