1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

1. The Plaintiff’s basic facts are owners of the D large 121 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and E warehouse sites of 121 square meters (the Plaintiff was awarded a successful bid on July 30, 2002 for the said land).

Defendant B is the owner of 31,30 square meters of a wooden flag and a pent roof on both the instant land and the instant land and the instant land, and 15.27 square meters of a lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux lux la

Defendant C is the former owner of the instant building, and is currently residing in the instant building.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 2 (including branch numbers for those with a branch number), results of surveying appraisal of appraiser G and the purport of whole pleadings.

2. In full view of the above basic facts as to the cause of the claim and the result of the commission of surveying and appraisal to appraiser G, part of the instant building exists in part of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, such as the current status of the attached appraisal drawings, and there is no title to occupy part of the instant land to B who is the owner of the instant building.

Ultimately, Defendant B is obligated to remove the portion of “A” and the 67 square meters of land on the roof, and deliver the said portion of the land to the Plaintiff, in sequence, connected to each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 1 of the land appraisal drawings on the ground of the instant case, and Defendant C is obligated to withdraw the said part of the said land.

The plaintiff's claim is justified.