The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a bicycle.

On January 2, 2017, the Defendant driven the above bicycle around 06:15, and proceeded the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C from the side of Seongbuk-gu to the salary tax office at an indefinite speed.

A driver of a vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the vehicle without impeding the course of other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the Y if he was the alley of her (Y) on the road, and went to the left from the right side of the course of the course of the course of the course by negligence, and received the part of the left side side of the e-crat-car from the Defendant’s bicycle front part.

After all, the Defendant damaged the property that is equivalent to approximately KRW 899,000 for the repair cost of the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions: Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

C. On September 14, 2017, after the institution of public prosecution, a written agreement was submitted to the effect that the wishing to punish him/her would be withdrawn.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;