logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단4514
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for two million won, respectively.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 4514"

1. The Defendants, on May 21, 2015, 02:50, smoked tobacco while drinking in the “Ecafeteria” located in the Busan Seo-gu, Busan. On the other hand, the Defendants, on the grounds that the victim F (the 24-year-old) who is the chief night officer at the main point is unable to smoke, i.e., “mabbbbbb”, etc., and threaten the me by drinking, and then threaten the me by drinking the me, and then, the Defendants resisting three customers on the name in the main point to smoke, respectively. Defendant A put the me on the me in a way that they puts the me to the me in a way that puts the me on the me to the me.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the victim, and thereby interfered with the victim's business by threatening customers G in the main place.

2. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) expressed a desire to arrest a police officer slope I (year 42) who was dispatched to the 112 report at the same time and place as above to the 112 report, and expressed the defect to the h district police officer who tried to arrest him as a flagrant offender with obstruction of business, and made the body of the victim several times of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order.

Defendant A, around 09:02 on July 30, 2015, 2015, called "112 patrols in front of the K District in Busan, the Busan, the 112 patrols in front of the K District." Defendant A, within the immediately preceding 112 patrols, stated that "in the case of the horse L, who was dispatched to the 112 declaration, he/she would raise complaints about the method of dealing with the horse L, on the ground that he/she is unrefilled with the 112 declaration." Defendant A, at the 112 patrols in his/her own, assaulted the chest of the 112 patrols in the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant has a legitimate execution of duties by a police officer due to violence.

arrow