logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.19 2019고정2429
과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2019, the Defendant was the principal who was raising satis in the front of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was negligent in taking necessary measures, such as drinking water of other persons or quitable satis, but was able to do so, and caused a victim C’s buckbucks coming on the side while satising satis together with his satis, thereby getting the victim to be urged for about two weeks of buckbucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint, a written diagnosis of injury, and standing photographs;

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 266 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant’s assertion is not deemed to have been negligent on the part of the Defendant, since the Defendant took necessary measures to ensure that the pattern he/she keyed does not have any other person or any other person.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by this court’s duly adopted and investigated evidence, namely, the Defendant’s sprink saw that the Defendant’s sprink saw that the sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprink sprinks were sent to C where the Defendant sprink sprink sprink spacks, but at that time, it does not seem that C had engaged in any act that could cause high sprink sprinks to the extent that sprink spacks, or other act that could cause high sprinks to sprink spacks, etc., it can be acknowledged that the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as maintaining the length of the sprink sprink sprink sprink spacks

Furthermore, the defendant was also bound by the book.

arrow