The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant unilaterally frightened the breath from the injured party and did not inflict an injury on the injured party.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below fully recognizes the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment below.

The defendant and the victim, as the chairperson and the general secretary of each D Promotion Committee, had a lot of appraisal during the debate on the contents of the appraisal company's contract.

M and J considered that two persons are tightly pushed and satisfing each other and they are satisfing.

In common, (Evidence No. 42 of the evidence record), the victim also left the clothes of each other in the court of original trial.

In order to get the buyer to get the buyer to get the buyer to get the buyer to get the buyer to get the buyer.

“The statement was made.”

The Defendant did not unilaterally dump to the victim and did not do so.

However, it is difficult to readily believe that a group of people who want to get out of the door generally in an emotional distressed and failed to do so even though it was left behind and prevented, and the Defendant himself/herself also recognized that “the Defendant himself/herself has a fact that he/she would inflict the victim’s hand on the victim who tried to get out of the door.” (Evidence No. 32 of the evidence record) The Defendant and the victim retired from fighting with the clothes of the people around three weeks of medical treatment, and the victim suffered injury, such as dump salt, both sides, sumpump salt, both sides, and sump salt, etc., which require medical treatment for about three weeks of the victim, and the Defendant suffered an injury, such as dumping and sumping around the front lebrosis possible (Evidence No. 4 of the evidence record, 39 pages). Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.