Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year, Defendant C’s imprisonment of six months, and Defendant D.

"2014 Gohap83"

1. Defendant A is a person who actually operates D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) and J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) with the main purpose of collecting aggregate.

On August 4, 2008, the Defendant: (a) was divided into 9,960 square meters of K forest and 18,235 square meters (hereinafter “K forest and 18,235 square meters”); and (b) was divided into 8,284 square meters of L forest and 8,284 square meters of M forest, 9,935 square meters of n forest and 25 square meters of land on September 19, 2009; and (c) was divided into 9,960 square meters of n forest and 25 square meters of n forest and 18,235 square meters of K forest and 18,235 square meters of k forest and 2000 square meters of n forest and 9,960 square meters of n forest and n among the divided land as above; and (d) was granted permission for conversion of mountainous district from that time

On September 2009, the Defendant heard that the O-Si forest and public officials B, who were in charge of the examination of permission for the diversion of the above mountainous district of the Defendant, were in charge of the examination of the above mountainous district conversion, and that they color the forests and fields suitable for the formation of electric houses.

Meanwhile, although the project for permission for mountainous district conversion as of August 4, 2008 was aimed at the installation of a cycle and an affiliated office, the main purpose of which is to gather earth and rocks necessary at the defendant's aggregate extraction site is to gather earth and rocks, while the main purpose of which is to obtain permission for the extraction of earth and rocks from the competent authority is to do not exist, and if it is discovered that the public viewing forest as the supervisory authority and the above facts were discovered, the permission for mountainous district conversion as of August 4, 2008 was likely to be immediately revoked, and the defendant planned to extend permission for mountainous district conversion and the public official of the competent authority should be seen well.

Accordingly, the Defendant divided the Defendant’s above K forest land into “B” and “B” into a suitable location and size for drawing up the Defendant’s above K forest land and sold it to “B.”

The indictment shall be written by the defendant around November 27, 2009 in the form of a written indictment.