The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, but the defendant already committed the crimes of this case, even though he had been punished four times due to the same kind of crime, the defendant completed the execution of imprisonment due to the same crime, and went to commit the crimes of this case only about two months, within the repeated period, and repeated the crimes of the same kind of criminal law by stealing the electric wire as in this case. The damaged goods of this case are objects that have significant influence on the daily life of local residents. In full view of the fact that the damaged goods of this case are objects that affect the daily life of local residents.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and various factors of sentencing indicated in the record, such as circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.