The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, but it is contradictory to that of this case, in light of the contents of the method of crime, danger of the victims, the number of victims, etc., the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of even though he was under the probation period due to the same crime, and the crime of this case committed the crime of this case is similar to the method of the crime of this case because the defendant threatened a person who is in the same kind of crime with a police officer. The defendant had the record of punishment several times, and other factors of all the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not judged that the sentence of the court below is unfair because the defendant's punishment is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.