A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who serves as B at the National Movement Center for Environmental Protection of Korea, a corporate marine joint and several environmental protection headquarters.

On January 13, 2016, the Defendant started to find the “E” place of business of the victim D operation in SP around 09:05 on the same day when he was engaged in surveillance activities for environmental protection at PPP at PPP at PP PP P PP P P P P P P P P P P P P P PP

The Defendant reported that the victim was on board a waste tree, vinyl, etc. on the part of the victim, and taken a photograph, and then did not require the payment of a fine, but the victim’s “it is an environmental monitoring team, which is so the illegal fine is about KRW 1 million to KRW 1.5 million.

The victim, who is frightening, has only three team members, "at other than frighten, and did not have a brighten, and did not have this photograph.

“...”

Then, it shows the photographs of other private crime prevention vehicles in cooperation with the police, and "any person who cooperates with the police shall be punished by double punishment.

“The police officer reported to the police officer,” and the police officer reported to the police officer.

The defendant, who received 40,00 won in cash from a person who suffered frighten from a frighten victim, was forced to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of ct on-site photographs legislation;

1. Relevant Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, or the method of committing the crime, are not good.

Even though the Defendant had been punished several times due to the crime, such as the fraud, (Habitual) attack, misrepresentation of public official qualification, and obstruction of business, etc. of the manual similar to the instant crime, he/she has been sentenced to the same crime.

However, there is a confession that the defendant is committing the crime of this case.