beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of three years and six months and by a fine of forty million won.
The defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From July 22, 2008 to February 4, 2010, the Defendant is a police officer who is in charge of guiding and controlling the public morals and sexual traffic offenders discharged from Seoul (C, and dismissed from office on March 29, 2012) in the living order and B (hereinafter “instant B”).
D From around 2005 to February 201, 2010, it was necessary to provide money and valuables on a regular basis to police officers, such as the Defendant, etc. with control authority over the above main points, who operated entertainment bars such as studal harassment in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and operated various entertainment bars such as studal harassment in Gangnam-gu.
The Defendant, who was a police official in the instant case B, conspired to receive money from the business owners of G (H prior to the opening of the name), I, J, K, etc. and business establishments, such as entertainment taverns in the jurisdiction, under the pretext of provision of enforcement information and crackdown.
Accordingly, on August 208, 2008, G was received KRW 45 million in total nine times from around the beginning of May 2009 to around the beginning of February 2009, as shown in the crime sight table (1) as shown in the attached Table, from the Defendant’s vehicle stopping in front of the above F entertainment tavern to October 2009, to provide information on police crackdowns related to entertainment taverns operated by the above D, and to receive KRW 5 million in response to the above solicitation as well as the receipt of KRW 5 million in relation to his duties, if the above establishments were controlled, and the Defendant received KRW 36 million in total from the Defendant’s vehicle stopping in front of the above F entertainment tavern as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (2).
Ultimately, the Defendant received a total of KRW 75 million as indicated in the crime sight table (1) and (2) together with D’s above solicitation.
Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with G, I, J, K, etc.