The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall repeatedly send any codes, words, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network in whose place he/she will reach another person.

1. 피해자 B에 대한 범행 피고인은 2018. 11. 22. 04:27경 대구 수성구 C, D호에 있는 피고인의 집에서 휴대전화를 이용하여 전남편인 피해자 B(60세)에게 “2018년 10월 20여일경 B!! ~ 용서 구하기 요망함”라는 문자메시지를 보낸 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2018. 12. 7. 07:45경까지 사이에 별지 범죄일람표와 기재와 같이 모두 11회에 걸쳐 불안감을 유발하는 문언을 반복적으로 피해자에게 도달하게 하였다.

2. around 05:04 on November 22, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E, using a mobile phone at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, sent a text message “B from the third to third party of the B’s request for the conversation” to the victim E, who is the wife of the said B, from November 24, 2018, until November 24, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the period by which the amount of KRW 100,000 is converted into one day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The content of the message sent pursuant to Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act is not severe, and the number of times is not much high. The Defendant produced F between the victim B and the victim’s divorce in 1985. The Defendant asserted that F is not a child and that F is not a child in the process of marriage preparation of F immediately before the crime of this case, and denies the parent-child relationship between B and the lawsuit.