1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 30,000,000 with respect thereto to the Plaintiff and the period from December 31, 2016 to October 17, 2017.

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The Defendants, on December 1, 2016, were convicted of criminal fraud at the Suwon District Court on the following criminal facts; Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months; Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment for four months; and Defendant C was convicted of two years of suspended execution (the above court 2016No6996); and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant B is a person who has worked as the director at the D Construction Site, and Defendant C is a person who was the chairperson of E fishermen's consultative body.

The defendants knew that the victim A (the plaintiff) needs to use E in the former Northwest-gunF in order to supply clothes for the installation of scam, and tried to use it to obtain money from the victim.

around May 20, 2014, the Defendants made a false statement to the Defendant B, stating that “The Defendant B shall pay the victim KRW 30 million in terms of the E user fee, and use E in receipt of the agreement from the E fishermen’s consultative body, and may enter into a contract for the construction of scisco and the supply of clothes,” and the Defendant C made a false statement to the effect that “Scco and the E fishermen’s consultative body will cooperate to the maximum extent possible with the use of E. The use of E.

However, even if the above E is approved by the Korea Rural Community Corporation I, the victim is unable to use E, and even if the victim receives money from the victim under the pretext of E fee, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to allow the victim to use E.

Nevertheless, on June 9, 2014, Defendant B received KRW 30 million from the victim to the corporate bank account under his/her name as E user fee, and Defendant C prepared and delivered the written agreement of the E fishermen Consultative Body to the victim on the same day.

As a result, the defendants were provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion.

[Grounds for recognition] The items of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The establishment of liability.