The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is recognized that the period of the defendant's installation of a speculative game product and operation of the game room is not limited, and that there is no record of punishment for the same crime.

However, since the crime committed by the defendant is highly harmful to society by neglecting the excessive spirit of gambling of the general public and impairing the awareness of sound labor, it is necessary to strictly punish him/her, so it is inevitable to sentence his/her sentence.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentencing was ultimately exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.