The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant made a confession of all crimes in this court, and recognized his mistake, and that the defendant did not have worked for the head of the game of this case, is favorable.

On the other hand, the crime related to the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, requires a strict punishment because of great social harm, such as promoting the excessive gambling spirit of the people and undermining sound labor awareness, etc. The defendant has been punished twice for the same crime, and in particular, even if he was sentenced to imprisonment in 2008, he committed the crime of this case even though he was sentenced to imprisonment in 208.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., as well as the application of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s allegation is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry since it is obvious that "the confiscation of defendant B: Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry" was omitted in the column of "application of the law" of the court below, and it is corrected as adding it ex officio in accordance with